Skip to main content
Edit Page - Admin Only Style Guide - Admin Only Control Panel - Admin Only
Voir Dire & Jury Selection

How to Spot Safetyists During Voir Dire

Safetyist jurors can cripple your case. A targeted, effective voir dire is your first and most critical line of defense.

Don’t Let Safetyists Derail Your Defense

How to Spot Safetyists During Voir Dire

“Safetyist” jurors threaten even the best defense. Avoid nuclear verdicts with a voir dire strategy that proactively identifies and removes safetyist jurors before they pose a problem to your case.

The Problem with Safetyist Jurors

Who Are Safetyists?

Safetyists demand 100% safety, 100% of the time. They tend to be:

  • Extremely risk-averse

  • Younger (especially Gen Z)

  • Emotional, intuitive, and unflinching in deliberations

  • Distrustful of corporations and government agencies

How Are They Impacting Verdicts?

Safetyist jurors are causing havoc for corporate defense teams. They have decided shocking verdicts with massive damages:

  • Example: A drowning at a public beach resulted in a $20.73 million verdict because the beach equipment defendant allegedly put "profits over people.”

  • Example: A cable company whose technician murdered a customer was hit with $7 billion in punitive damages due to “negligent hiring practices.”

Key Questions for Voir Dire

Personal Risk Tolerance

  • "Have you ever stopped using a product due to potential health and safety risks?"

  • "Do you believe companies should ensure their products are 100% safe, 100% of the time?"

Corporate Responsibility

  • "If a product is misused and someone gets hurt, is the manufacturer still at fault?"

  • "Should medicines warn about every possible side effect, no matter how small?"

  • "Should products warn about every possible risk of injury, no matter how remote?"

  • "Do manufacturers have the responsibility to research and prevent every possible misuse of their products?"

Views on Government Agencies

  • "Do you trust agencies like the EPA, FDA, and OSHA to keep people safe?"

  • "Do you think corporations have too much influence on government agencies?"

  • "Are most government agencies too understaffed and underfunded to do a good job?"

Why? Research shows that distrust of regulatory agencies is significantly correlated with risk aversion and pro-plaintiff verdicts.


Maximizing Cause Challenges

Communicating with Jurors

  • Give them permission to be critical: “I have tough skin. Be brutally honest.”

  • Encourage others to share by appreciating negative views: “Thanks for sharing that.”

  • Get them to expand by “mirroring”: Repeat their last few words as a question.

  • Leverage group agreement: “Who agrees with Juror 5?”

  • Lay the grounds for cause: “Would this belief affect your ability to be fair?”

Strategic Considerations

  • Conduct pre-trial research to know your venire before you walk in.

  • Request additional voir dire time to uncover deep-seated biases.

  • File a motion for individual voir dire to prevent juror contamination.

  • Focus on high-risk safetyists to make the most of your limited time.

  • Form challenges early to get commitments on the record.

A Winning Defense Starts with Voir Dire

Safetyist jurors can cripple your case. A targeted, effective voir dire is your first and most critical line of defense.

Don't leave jury selection to chance.

Partner with IMS Legal Strategies to develop a smarter voir dire strategy today.

Contact IMS