Simplify complex insurance claims into a story that wins trust.
Lay juries asked to measure the fairness in insurance disputes require clear explanations of cases whose evidence often includes dense policy language, actuarial tables, and claims files. A complicating factor for litigators is the bias jurors may have against insurance companies before any evidence is presented. The strategic goal is often to get to the underlying coverage and claims-handling analysis right, then translate it into a narrative that holds up against skepticism.
Common disputes in this space include:
- Policy interpretation disputes
- Bad faith claims
- Coverage and recovery litigation
- Claims processing disputes
- Regulatory and compliance matters
- Fraud investigations
IMS brings decades of experience supporting Am Law 100 firms in matters like these, in litigation, mediation, and arbitration across federal and state courts. Our expert witness and litigation consulting teams provide integrated support to help clients organize policy and claims detail into a cohesive case that a judge, jury, or arbitration panel can readily absorb. Read more below.